Cornucopia - Symbol of Fertility and Abundance
This Thanksgiving we can dive into the History, Cultural Significance, and Evolution and symbolism behind one of the holiday's most iconic motifs: the cornucopia. Often seen overflowing with a bountiful harvest, the cornucopia, or "horn of plenty," represents abundance, nourishment, and gratitude—a fitting symbol as we gather to celebrate the season of supposed thankfulness, and more truthfully, overeating to avoid conversations with family members.
Throughout the ages, the cornucopia has symbolised abundance. The motif originated as a curved goat’s horn filled to overflowing with fruit and grain, but could be filled with whatever the owner wished. The cornucopia has held a significant place in various cultures, from its roots in ancient Greek mythology to its prominence in modern-day celebrations. In this article, we’ll explore how similar imagery to the cornucopia, but more so the idea of bounty it embodies, transcends time and only partially yields to geography, revealing insights into how societies have revered nature’s gifts and expressed their gratitude for the harvest. By uncovering the stories, myths, and artistic representations of the cornucopia, and considering how its symbolism resonates today, we can reflect on how we should use this time to celebrate the things we do have. Join in on this journey through history and art that celebrates the essential role of abundance in our lives.
The Horn of Plenty
Cornucopia comes from the Late Latin cornu copiae, which translates literally as “horn of plenty” and is a symbol that embodies abundance and nourishment. Although its original Greek name is unknown, we can trace its roots back to ancient Greek (originally Cretan) mythology (Borumand, 2018, Britannica 1998). Traditionally depicted as a curved goat's horn overflowing with fruits, grains, and flowers, it represents the bountiful harvest and prosperity of the earth. Greek mythology offers multiple explanations of the origin of the cornucopia:
The GOAT
In Hesiod's Theogony, after Cronus swallowed all of his children immediately after their births. Their mother, the goddess Rhea, Zeus' mother, deceived her brother-consort Cronus by giving him a stone wrapped to look like a baby instead of Zeus. She instead gave the infant Zeus to Adamanthea, a doublet or epithet of Amalthea, to nurse in a cave on Mount Ida in Crete. The Greek tradition relates that so that Cronus would not hear the wailing of the infant, Amalthea gathered the Curetes around the cave or the Korybantes to dance, shout, and clash their spears against their shields (Kerenyi 1951: 94).
One of the best-known incarnations of the story after the birth and moving of the baby Zeus to the cave, was when he was cared for and protected by a number of divine attendants, including the goat Amalthea/Amalthaea or Amaltheia (Ancient Greek: Ἀμάλθεια) meaning Tender Goddess or Nourishing Goddess, who fed him with her milk. The suckling future king of the gods had unusual abilities and strength, and in playing with his nursemaid, accidentally broke off one of her horns, which then had the divine power to provide unending nourishment, as the foster mother had to the god. (Leeming 2005; Johnston & Mastrocinque 2016).
In a similar version, Amalthaea was a nymph, who nurtured the infant Zeus with goat's milk. Baby Zeus accidentally broke off the horn of the goat which then had the divine power to provide unending nourishment. In general, the horn was regarded as the symbol of inexhaustible riches and plenty and became the attribute of various divinities and of rivers as fertilizers of the land. Amalthaea filled the horn with flowers and fruits and presented it to Zeus, who, according to one version, placed it, together with the goat which was revered by Zeus, among the stars as the constellation Capricorn. (Britannica 2024).
Figure 3. The Origin of the Cornucopia (Oil on canvas) ca. 1619 by Abraham Janssens.
In some traditions, Amalthea's skin (as a goat), or that of her goat, was taken by Zeus in honor of her when she died (Hyginus De Astronomica, 2.13.7-8). This became the protective aegis in the Iliad, a device carried by Athena and Zeus. It’s been variously interpreted as an animal skin or a shield and sometimes featuring the head of a Gorgon (Hyginus De Astronomica 2.13; Homer 735 BCE)
Figure 4. Infancy of Zeus by Jacob Jordaens, early 1630s, now at the Louvre Museum (The Yorck Project 2002).
Figure 5. Amalthea and Jupiter's goat, by Pierre Julien, 1787 (Louvre Museum). A long line coiled around the goat's horns acts as a tether. The statue was commissioned for the Queen's dairy at Rambouillet. Photo from Marie-Lan Nguyen (2006).
The name Amalthea itself appears to be an epithet, signifying the presence of an earlier nurturing goddess or maiden-goddess (Graves 2017:42) whom the Greeks knew to be located in Crete, where Minoans may have called her a version of "Dikte"(Bennet 1985: 231-249; Astour 1966: 313-317). Ancient authors proposed several possible derivations of the name Amaltheia. Hesychius writes that it comes from the verb 'ἀμαλθεύειν' amaltheuein meaning "to nourish, to enrich", while others derive it from 'ἀμάλθακτος' amalthaktos meaning "hard, firm". Still, others proposed origin from 'ἀμαλὴ θεία' amalē theia meaning "divine goat". Though the common derivation is from 'ἀμέλγειν' amelgein, which means "to milk, or suck" (Smith 1853).
Achelous and Heracles
In another myth, the cornucopia's connection to the myth of Achelous (Αχελώος) and Heracles (Χερακλες)(Roman: Hercules) and the horn after their battle. Achelous, a river god who could change forms, in one version transformed into a bull to fight Hercules for Deianeira's (Δηιάνειρα) hand. Hercules wrestled Achelous to the ground and tore off one of his horns. In others, river gods themselves could be depicted as horned which would have been what Heracles ripped off (Ovid, Metamorphoses 9.87–88, as cited by J. Rufus Fears 1981: 821). This version is represented in the Achelous and Hercules mural painting by the American Regionalist artist Thomas Hart Benton (Figure 6).
Figure 6. Thomas Hart Benton, Achelous and Hercules, 1947, tempera and oil on canvas mounted on plywood, Smithsonian American Art Museum, Gift of Allied Stores Corporation, and museum purchase through the Smithsonian Institution Collections Acquisition Program, 1985.2
The Expansion
The cornucopia became the attribute of several Greek and Roman deities, particularly those associated with the harvest, prosperity, or spiritual abundance. These gods included Demeter (Δεμέτερ/Deméter), Dionysus (Διόνυσος/Diónysos), Avontantia (Αβονταντια), Tyche (Τύχη/Týchi), Hades (Κάδες/Kádes) as well as the personifications of Earth (Gaia or Terra). The child Hades (Roman: Plutus), god of riches and the underworld, brother of Zeus and son of the grain goddess Demeter in some mythologies while also being her son-in-law since he married her daughter Persephone. Hades, the classical ruler of the underworld in the mystery religions, was a giver of agricultural, mineral and spiritual wealth, and in art often holds a cornucopia (Figures 7-9). The nymph Maia (Μαία), who is the oldest daughter of Atlas (Άτλας) and the Oceanid nymph Pleione (Πληιόνη) (mother of the Pleiades) was a goddess who provided fruit, vegetation, and flowers. Tyche, later known as Fortuna, the goddess of luck (Figures 11 & 12), had the power to grant prosperity.
Further Roman Use
This mythical association linked the cornucopia to the gods and the divine blessings of nature and fertility. The Roman version of the cornucopia was often depicted as a curved, spiral horn, typically made of animal horn, decorated with fruits and flowers, reinforcing its connection to the bounties of nature and agriculture.
As with the Greeks, the Romans also adopted this symbol and connected it to Fortuna, the goddess of luck, and Ceres (the Roman version of Demeter), the goddess of agriculture. The cornucopia was depicted in a variety of ways in Roman art, including on coins, sculptures, and frescoes, where it was shown as a horn overflowing with fruits, grain, and sometimes even precious objects (Figures 14 & 15). In these depictions, the cornucopia symbolized not just abundance but also prosperity and the favor of the gods. In the Roman Imperial cult, abstract Roman deities who fostered peace (pax Romana - the Roman peace) and prosperity were also depicted with a cornucopia, including Abundantia (Avontantia) "Abundance" personified, and Annona (Άννωνα/Ánnona), goddess of the grain supply to the city of Rome. (Clinton 1992: 105–107). The ‘personification’ of the peace, the goddess Pax (παξ) is also shown with a cornucopia to further emphasise the opulence and wealth during this Roman golden era. Fruits and grains were included in Pax's image to symbolize the return and growth of farming, especially as many veterans settled on farms after the civil wars (Schroder 2019). Pax was also depicted with twins, reflecting the domestic peace of the Pax Romana, which was enhanced when fathers were home instead of fighting. The imagery of cows, pigs, and sheep on the Ara Pacis represented the abundance of food and farming during this period, with these animals often sacrificed to Pax (Stern 2015). In the later years of her worship, Pax was rarely shown with the caduceus and began to share more features with Augustus, suggesting a connection to the Pax Augusta trying to prove his right to rule through divinity (Schroder 2019).
Figure 14. Roman Goddess Ceres with Cornucopia Reproduction Mosaic Wall Art (from Mosaic Natural).
Figure 15. Emperors claimed a partnership with Ceres in grain provision, as in this sestertius of 66 AD.
[a]: Nero, garlanded.
[b]: Annona stands with cornucopiae (horns of Plenty); enthroned Ceres holds grain ears and torch; between is a modius (grain measure) on a garlanded altar; in the background is a ship's stern.
Figure 16. Depiction of Pax on the Ara Pacis.
Fertility Symbols
The triangle, another ancient symbol, was widely used to represent female fertility and the pubic area in various civilizations, including Mesopotamia, Phoenicia, and Egypt (السید ندا [Neda] 2023). In the Sepik cultures of Papua New Guinea, the triangle conveys complex meanings related to gender, life, and death, depending on its orientation (Hauser-Schäublin, 1994). Both the cornucopia and the triangle serve as powerful visual symbols in ancient art, communicating ideas of abundance, fertility, and fundamental cultural values that may not be easily expressed through other means.
Ancient fertility symbols have played a significant role in various cultures throughout history. These symbols, often inspired by nature, reflect human reproductive concerns and their connection to the natural world (Behjati-Ardakani et al., 2016). The concept of fertility extends beyond human reproduction to include animals and plants, manifesting in iconic and symbolic forms such as statues, reliefs, and textual expressions (Cahyono, 2012).
The cornucopia’s imagery has been used in art and sculpture for millennia, as evidenced by a Roman marble cornucopia found in Navarra, Spain (Pintado et al. 2011: 103-104). The cornucopia holds various foods, a bunch of grapes in the foreground, several nuts, apples and, at the top, a pine cone (Figures 17[a] & 17[b])(Pintado et al. 2011: 104). The fragment is damaged on its left side where it would have joined the figure of which the cornucopia was a portion and was only lightly worked on at the back, although enough to suggest that the cornucopia should have been connected to a round sculpture (Pintado et al. 2011: 104).
Figure 17[a] and 17[b]. Roman marble cornucopia found in Navarra, Spain (Pintado et al. 2011: 105).
The symbol spread to Iran and India, likely due to Hellenistic influence (Borumand 2018). Artists like Rubens creatively adapted the cornucopia (McGrath 1977), which also appeared on Samian-ware pottery, with its decorative styles evolving from the pre-Flavian to the late Hadrianic-Antonine (Αδριανής-Αντωνίνη) periods (Pryce 1930). While traditionally associated with agricultural abundance, the cornucopia's versatility allowed it to represent various concepts of prosperity and fecundity across different cultures and time periods (Borumand 2018; McGrath 1977).
In Western art, Rubens prominently featured, not technically a cornucopia, but baskets, sometimes filling it with unexpected items such as children or regal insignia to symbolize fertility. Rubens’ painting of the future king Erichthonius (Εριχθόνιος), the monstrous offspring of Vulcan and Gaia (or Mother Earth), takes place in the garden of Diana Ephesus (Διάνα Έφεσος/Diána Éfesos)(McGrath, 1977). The Discovery of Erichthonius (ca. 1616 & the earlier version from ca. 1615) is though to be among Rubens’ strangest mythological scenes (Figures 18 & 19) (Mandabach 2021). Like the Head of Medusa, it depicts Mother Nature in a polarized form, as a female sculptural body and the generative liquid that erupts from it (Figure 20). According to Ovid, when Vulcan tried and failed to rape Minerva, his seed spilt onto the earth, accidentally mating with the mythological Earth Mother, Gaia. Their offspring, Erichthonius, was a human infant with serpentine lower limbs. After his birth, Minerva shut him in a box, which she gave to the three daughters of the Attic king Cecrops (Κέκρωψ/Kékrops), warning them never to look inside. Rubens depicts the moment when one of the girls, Aglaurus (Αγλαύρος/Aglávros), disobeys and reveals the monster to her sisters (Ovid Metamorphoses 2:531–65). The scene is set in an ornate Flemish garden filled with antiquarian objects, the largest and most prominent of which is a mossy stone fountain statue of Diana Ephesus, an ancient herm that in the Renaissance had become an emblem of nature’s fertility (with 5 or 6 boobs — depending on the version)(Goesch 1996). The sixteenth-century emblems identify Diana Ephesus simply as Natura, an association extending to Gaia (Alpers 1967).
Figure 18. Peter Paul Rubens, The Discovery of Erichthonius, ca. 1616, oil on canvas, 218 x 317 cm. Liechtenstein Museum, Vienna, inv. no. GE111.
Figure 19. Peter Paul Rubens, The Discovery of Erichthonius, ca. 1615, oil on panel, 50 x 41 cm. The Courtauld Gallery of Art, London, The Samuel Courtauld Trust P.1978.PG.364.
Figure 20. Peter Paul Rubens and Frans Snyders, Head of Medusa, ca. 1613–1618, oil on canvas, 68.5 x 118 cm, Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna, inv. No. GG 3834.
The cornucopia has undergone significant transformations in both its symbolic meaning and visual representation across different historical periods and cultures. Its evolution from a classical symbol of divine abundance to a contemporary emblem of commercial excess reflects broader shifts in societal values, economics, and artistic styles. In connected areas, the symbols and their meanings bled together.
Hinduism and Buddhism
The iconography of Hārītī shows similarities to the Greek goddess Tyche/ Roman goddess Fortuna and may have been transmitted to East Asia through the influence of Greco-Buddhism. In Greek art, Tyche was depicted in the presence of children, carrying a cornucopia, an emblematic gubernaculum (ship's rudder or steering wheel), and the wheel of fortune; she may stand on the wheel, presiding over the entire circle of fate (Figures 21-23)(Tanabe 2003).
Gaja Lakshmi (गज लक्ष्मी), is also tied to Fortuna as the name “Lakshmi” also occurs in common usage as a word meaning “auspicious” or “fortunate woman.” She is crowned with a tripartite diadem, enthroned on a lion seat, and is venerated as a bringer of good fortune and well-being to the earth, of which she was an early personification. The two elephants that lustrate her with water from pots held in their trunks can be equated with the rainclouds of the monsoon and successful crops. This aspect is further emphasized by her cornucopia in the form of a flowering lotus, symbolizing abundance (Figure 24). Lakshmi, the goddess of wealth, with lotus flowers or coins spilling from her hands, represents both spiritual and material abundance. The Indian concept of abundance is often tied to karma and the spiritual reward of giving, and Lakshmi’s symbol of wealth and prosperity shares thematic connections with the cornucopia’s representative role.
Similarly, in Buddhist traditions, the cornucopia might be conceptually linked with spiritual nourishment, where the abundance spilling from a container represents the endless virtues and blessings of life.
Middle East
Mesopotamia
In Assyrian art, ornamental bands surrounding central scenes represented the promise of plenty resulting from the king's divine relationship (Winter, 2009). Mesopotamian imagery, particularly in Babylonia and Assyria, often avoided anthropomorphic representations of deities outside temples, instead using symbols, animals, hybrids, or geometric motifs, including curved lines, in the case of Sumerian ornamentation (Ornan, 2005; Mardan, 2012). This avoidance of human-like divine imagery parallels the Biblical image ban, possibly influenced by Assyrian and Babylonian practices during the Judahite exile (Ornan, 2005). Mesopotamian art evolved from Sumerian times through the late Assyrian and Neo-Babylonian periods, encompassing various regions and cultures (Frankfort, 1955).
Ancient Mesopotamia (Sumer, Babylon, Assyria) had imagery similar to the cornucopia as vessels or horns overflowing with food to represent agricultural fertility. These cornucopia-like motifs as crescent-shaped symbols were closely associated with deities like Inanna (𒌋𒁯)/later known as Ishtar or Dumuzi (𒌉𒍣)/later known as Tammūz, a goddess and god of fertility and harvest, and who appeared on ancient seals and sculptural reliefs. Though not identical to the classical European cornucopia, these representations of the crescent shapes still convey similar meanings related to abundance and fertility and were often associated with powerful goddesses.
Visual representations of agricultural surplus reinforced themes of abundance from the Uruk to Neo-Sumerian periods (Winter 2009). Excavations in the Royal Cemetery at Ur, in Queen Puabi's tomb, revealed jewelry and ornaments depicting fruits and date inflorescences associated with the fertility goddess Inanna, while twisted wire pendants may symbolize the shepherd god Dumuzi (Miller 2013). The Warka Vase illustrates the agricultural food chain, culminating with Inanna and the king's sacred marriage ritual ensuring prosperity (Taiz & Lee Taiz 2018).
Crescent crowns on alabaster figurines of Ishtar-Aphrodite from Hellenistic Babylonia connected their elite owners to temples and astrological knowledge (Langin-Hooper, 2023). These figurines allowed women to construct sexual agency and facilitate their journey to the afterlife. Babylonian artists primarily worked on a small scale, creating portable objects like vases, plaques, and cylinder seals to express their artistic ideas, as large-scale mural relief work was impossible due to the lack of suitable stone (Perkins, 1957).
Egypt
Ancient Egyptian art and mythology intertwined agriculture, religion, and daily life. The cornucopia symbol appears in tomb paintings, possibly representing harvest offerings to deities like Renenūtet a cobra-headed goddess of grain, grapes, nourishment and the harvest (Figure —)(Marini, Paolo. "Renenutet: worship and popular piety at Thebes in the New Kingdom". Journal of Intercultural and Interdisciplinary Archaeology; Blackman, 1922;Pinch, G. (2004). Egyptian mythology: A guide to the gods, goddesses, and traditions of ancient Egypt. Oxford University Press, USA.). Egyptian art rarely depicted narrative scenes, instead focusing on standardized activities and rituals (Kantor, 1957). Because of this, agricultural scenes were common, showcasing the importance of farming in Egyptian culture (Janick, 2002). Egypt's advanced agricultural technology, developed over 6000 years ago, influenced Western civilization and incorporated innovations from neighboring regions (Janick, 2002). The dry climate and well-preserved tombs have allowed researchers to reconstruct Egypt's agricultural history through artistic representations (Janick, 2002; Kantor, 1957).
Fecundity figures, personifications of non-sexual fertility, played a significant role in Egyptian iconography (Baines, 1984). These figures often appeared in offering processions and scenes of "uniting the Two Lands," also symbolizing agricultural prosperity.
The gazelle, a common motif in Egyptian art, was associated with the desert and themes of death and rebirth, often appearing in hunting scenes and as a symbol of feminine divinity (Strandberg, 2009). Hieroglyphic representations of plants, vessels, and food items further reinforced themes of abundance in Egyptian visual culture (Wilkinson, 1992).
Ancient Egyptian art frequently linked representations of abundance to the goddess Hathor who was depicted as a cow-headed goddess protecting the Pharaoh and as a sky goddess with cow horns (Davidson, 2002). Milk offerings were made to deities, and the dead Pharaoh was portrayed receiving new life from Hathor's milk (Davidson, 2002). In temple scenes, meat offerings were presented to Hathor and other deities, symbolizing the elimination of enemies and the progress of the gods (Kamel, 2019). Abundance was a central theme in ancient Near Eastern art, reinforced through visual representations of agricultural surplus (Winter, 2009). Stelae from later periods continued to depict individuals offering sistra and menats to Hathor, emphasizing her role as a goddess of abundance (Peet, 1920).
Ancient and Viking-Era Scandinavia
In ancient and Viking-era Scandinavia, the cornucopia as a literal symbol does not appear. However, several themes related to abundance and fertility are central to the mythological and cultural world of the Norse and Scandinavian peoples.
In Norse Mythology there is a plethora of symbols for abundance: including the goddess Freyja, of fertility, love, and prosperity, especially in terms of agricultural fertility and the bounty of the earth. She is also connected to the Brísingamen, a magical necklace that symbolizes abundance, wealth, and prosperity, and is sometimes considered a form of divine bounty. Yggdrasil, the World Tree, the Norse Harvest and Feasts to celebrate the abundance of the land though no cornucopia were present per se. These Blóts (sacrificial feasts) were dedicated to the gods of the harvest (like Freyr, the god of fertility and agriculture) symbolizing abundance through ritual and offerings.
The Horn of Mead
The horn of mead (sometimes depicted in Norse imagery) could be considered a metaphorical equivalent of the cornucopia in some ways, as mead (a fermented beverage made from honey) was associated with wealth, celebration, and fertility in Norse society. The drinking horn was a symbol of both generosity and abundance.
The Horn of Mead holds significant symbolism in Norse mythology, closely associated with Óðinn's quest for sacred mead (Kozák, 2021). This quest is depicted in two contrasting myths, representing both passive and active aspects of Óðinn's journey to the Otherworld (Kozák, 2021). Drinking horns played a crucial role in Viking Age culture, as evidenced by archaeological finds and literary sources (Hofmann, 2015). These horns were not only practical vessels but also carried mythological significance, often connected to gods like Thor and the cosmic struggle between gods and giants (Lindow, 2002). The Golden Horns of Jutland, dating to the 5th century CE, provide insight into early Norse iconography and runic inscriptions (Reiche, 1973). These horns featured complex engravings and disguised runic inscriptions, suggesting a sophisticated use of runes for both linguistic and numerical purposes, possibly indicating magical or religious significance (Reiche, 1973).
Figure . Late Medieval drinking horn, mounted in copper gilt. The expanding mouth bears an inscription with leaves between the words. A band engraved with foliage passes around the middle of the horn, and from it proceed two bird's claws forming the feet of the vessel, the third being a quatrefoil-shaped projection. The end of the mount is curved inwards and terminates in a hexagonal rosette. Made in 15th century Denmark. (British Museum - AF.3127).
Figure. Icelandic Drinking Horns- Viking drinking horns, often elaborately decorated with intricate carvings, were used in rituals and feasts, symbolizing the prosperity provided by the earth, particularly the mead, which was a drink of abundance and divine favor. These drinking horns sometimes featured motifs related to fertility and nature such as animals, plants, or the Yggdrasil tree. They highlight the connection between earthly sustenance and the divine.
Example: The Mammen-style drinking horns, found in Denmark, feature intricate engravings of animals and symbols that might connect nature’s abundance to the Viking gods.
Figure . Viking axe from Mammen, located near Bjerringbro in Central Jutland in Denmark, example of Mammen-style (National Museum of Denmark n.d.).
Druidic and Celtic Traditions
The Celtic peoples, including those who practised Druidism, did not use the cornucopia symbol directly, but they had a profound connection to divinity, nature, fertility, and the earth's abundance. Several symbols of abundance, such as cauldrons, vessels, and nature-based motifs, appear in Celtic art and mythology and may echo the themes represented by the cornucopia. The Celtic people celebrated seasonal festivals like Imbolc, Bealtaine, Lughnasadh, and Samhain, which marked the cycles of planting, harvesting, and feasting.
The Cauldron of Plenty/ The Cauldron of Dagda
One of Celtic mythology's most iconic symbols of abundance is the Cauldron of Plenty (or the Cauldron of Inspiration), which appears in various stories, particularly in Irish and Welsh mythology. The Cauldron of Dagda (a prominent Celtic deity) was said to provide an endless supply of food and drink, akin to the symbolism of a cornucopia, but in the form of a cauldron rather than a horn. In these tales, the cauldron is often described as providing infinite abundance to those deserving or in need, particularly in the context of hospitality or rituals of feasting and celebration.
It’s also a powerful feminine symbol in Celtic and Druidic traditions, representing regeneration, enlightenment, and the Great Mother's womb (Glaser, 2022). This mythical vessel is associated with rebirth and is prevalent in various legends and tales, often worshipped in holy wells and hot springs (Glaser, 2022). The concept of the Cauldron is sometimes thought to have evolved into the Christian Grail, exemplifying the common medieval practice of Christianizing pagan symbols and customs (Brown, 1916).
In Celtic artwork, while not a physical artifact, the Cauldron of Dagda would be depicted in symbolic representations of feasts and rituals of abundance. The cauldron is often shown as a vessel of prosperity that provides not only food but also spiritual nourishment. In Celtic metalwork, such as brooches or goblets, motifs inspired by the Cauldron of Plenty might be found, where animal and plant imagery emphasize life’s cyclical nature and the gifts of the land.
**Celtic religious iconography, including cauldron symbolism, provides insights into pre-Roman and Roman-era belief systems (Green, 1992). In contemporary New Age circles, there is a renewed interest in Celtic and Druidic symbolism, with "Celticity" being viewed as a quality rather than a historical or geographical fact (Bowman, 1993). This modern interpretation often combines innovative ideas with elements of 18th-century antiquarian speculation, portraying Celts and Druids as enlightened, noble figures (Bowman, 1993).
The Gundestrup Cauldron/Bowl
Another example of Celtic art is the Gundestrup Cauldron, a large, silver vessel dating to the 1st century BCE found in Denmark in 1891 (Figure —)(Klindt-Jensen, 1959). It features elaborate depictions of rituals, nature gods, and sacred animals. The cauldron is argued to symbolize the connection between nature, the harvest, and the divine, with figures related to agriculture, the fertility of the earth, and the abundance of nature, as it was believed to contain the power to feed and nourish through its sacred and divine associations.
Its elaborate reliefs, created by multiple skilled artisans, depict human busts, deities, and various motifs (Klindt-Jensen, 1959). One plate features a goddess with cuckoos, symbolizing spring and fertility (Nance, 2019). The cauldron's iconography includes sacrificial scenes, a "deer-god," and a "wheel-god," reflecting its ceremonial significance (Hachmann, 1990). While its exact origin remains debated, scholars tend to agree on its Continental Celtic context focusing on the vessel's unique blend of Celtic and Oriental imagery (Olmsted, 1976). Its craftsmanship, particularly the bull on the bottom plate, demonstrates skill leading Gundestrup Cauldron to continue to be a subject of extensive study, offering insights into late Iron Age religious beliefs and artistic traditions.(Klindt-Jensen, 1959).
Horn of Plenty in Irish Mythology
While not as common as the cauldron, some early Irish texts do refer to horns filled with abundance. For example, the Horn of the Dagda was a magical object that could provide sustenance when needed. While it’s not described exactly as a "cornucopia," its symbolic link to plenty and divine favor is a comparable theme, especially with a horn shape.
**The Dagda, a prominent figure in Irish mythology, shares similarities with the Norse god Thor as a defender of the realm and wielder of powerful implements like a club or hammer (Shaw, 2019). The Dagda's harp, a symbol of his power, features in the tale of its recovery, paralleling Thor's story in Norse mythology (Shaw, 2019). As a member of the Túatha Dé Danann, the Dagda represents a perspective on time and mortality in the Cath Maige Tuired narrative (Nagy, 2021). Celtic religious iconography, including symbols associated with deities like the Dagda, provides insights into pre-Roman and Roman-era belief systems (Green, 1992). Irish Bronze Age horns (Figure —), often found in groups, were significant wind instruments of the period, with typological variations and potential musical applications (Coles, 1963). These horns, along with other mythological symbols, contribute to our understanding of ancient Irish culture and beliefs.
Figure —. An Irish bronze side-blow horn, late Bronze Age, c. 8th-7th century BC. 24⅛ in (61.5 cm) long. Sold for £162,500 on 7 July 2021 (From Christie’s in London).
Art Through Time: Symbol of Divine Providence and Wealth
Medieval Use
During the Medieval period, the cornucopia lost some of its earlier connection to pagan mythology and became more associated with Christian symbolism, representing divine providence and the gifts of God. While it was still used in religious contexts, it was often a symbol of the bounty bestowed upon believers by a gracious God. The medieval cornucopia was less frequently seen in visual art but appeared in some illuminated manuscripts, where it symbolized the abundance of God's grace.
Renaissance and Baroque
The Renaissance marked a revival of interest in classical mythology, and the cornucopia re-emerged as a prominent symbol of prosperity and wealth, especially in art and literature. It was now used in allegorical depictions of abundance and was frequently associated with the god Bacchus, the god of wine, or Ceres, the goddess of harvests. While it was used in religious contexts, particularly in Christian iconography as a symbol of divine grace and fertility it was also a symbol of both material wealth and spiritual grace, often seen in still-life paintings and as allegories of prosperity.
The Baroque period also saw the cornucopia flourish as an artistic motif, especially in still-life paintings, where it was often used to signify luxury, opulence, and bountiful harvests. Artists like Caravaggio and Rubens used the cornucopia to highlight the pleasures of the material world. The cornucopia became a central object in paintings that depicted feasts, celebrations, and the wealth of the earth. In Baroque sculpture, the cornucopia often appeared as part of elaborate allegorical works, symbolizing the blessings of fortune, wealth, and victory. During these periods the horns often became more ornate, curved in exaggerated spirals, or made to appear more decorative and stylized. The cornucopia now included not just fruits and flowers but also luxury items, such as jewels, coins, wines, and rich fabrics, emphasizing both divine and earthly wealth, possibly implying that they may be connected.
Caravaggio’s "The Supper at Emmaus" (1601): A cornucopia rests on the table, subtly reinforcing the theme of divine providence and abundance.
Peter Paul Rubens' "The Triumph of the Eucharist" (1625-1626): A cornucopia is part of an allegorical depiction of abundance and spiritual nourishment.
Giovanni Bellini’s "The Feast of the Gods" (1514): The cornucopia is used to symbolize the generosity of nature, surrounding the gods in an abundance of fruits, animals, and wine.
Baroque Still-Life Paintings - NOT CORN. lot of food though
Jan Davidsz de Heem's "Still-Life with Fruit, Flowers, Glasses and Lobster " (1667): A lavish cornucopia spilling over with fruits represents both the physical and spiritual nourishment provided by the bounty of the earth.
Abraham van Beyeren’s "Still Life with Lobster and Fruit" (early 1650s): The cornucopia is placed near luxury items like lobsters and fine wines to illustrate the wealth and pleasure of the upper class.
18th and 19th Centuries: A Symbol of National and Commercial Prosperity
Enlightenment and Revolutionary Periods
In the 18th century, as European societies followed the Enlightenment and thus, became more focused on reason, commerce, and material wealth, the cornucopia became a symbol of economic prosperity and national wealth. It appeared frequently in political iconography, symbolizing the abundance of resources and the benefits of commercial society.
Victorian Era and Commercialization
During the Victorian era (1837-1901), the cornucopia became a common image in the context of harvest festivals and Thanksgiving celebrations, especially in the United States. It symbolized the abundance of the harvest and the gratitude for nature's bounty.
The growing commercial markets also began using the cornucopia in advertisements to symbolize consumer abundance, especially in relation to food products, and to evoke the joy of plentiful living.
The Visual Characteristics of the cornucopia became more stylized and less literal in the 18th/19th centuries. It was often rendered in vibrant colors in advertisements and prints and commonly depicted with fruits, vegetables, grain, and flowers, but with a growing emphasis on luxury items as industrial production and trade expanded.
20th and 21st Centuries: The Commercialization of the Cornucopia
Mass Consumerism
In the 20th century, the cornucopia began to lose its original associations with divine favor and agricultural fertility and became more closely linked to commercialism and consumer culture. It became a symbol of excess and overconsumption in a rapidly industrializing world.
During Thanksgiving celebrations in the United States, the cornucopia became widely recognized as the symbol of the harvest season, but it was increasingly used in a commercial context—for example, in advertisements promoting food products or grocery store displays to encourage consumption.
Modern Art and Pop Culture
In contemporary art, the cornucopia has often been reinterpreted as a symbol of commercialism and consumer excess. Artists like Andy Warhol and Jeff Koons have used the imagery of abundance to comment on the growing commodification of culture and the surplus of material goods in modern society.
Thanksgiving advertising has continued to incorporate the cornucopia as a central image in promoting ideas of family gatherings, celebration, and the bounty of the earth, though increasingly commercialized as part of the larger consumer culture.
Visual Characteristics in the 20th/21st Centuries
The cornucopia’s shape has become less organic and more symbolic, often abstracted in modern art or stylized in advertisements to reflect man-made abundance rather than natural or divine bounty. The cornucopia may still feature traditional fruits and vegetables, but it also holds consumer goods, such as toys, gadgets, and luxury items, symbolizing both material excess and the mass production of goods.
Jeff Koons’ "Gazing Ball" series (2010): A modern interpretation of classical motifs, where elements of classical art, including cornucopia shapes, are reframed to comment on consumerism and modern excess.
Andy Warhol’s "Campbell’s Soup Cans" (1962): While not a direct use of the cornucopia, Warhol’s work symbolizes mass abundance and consumer culture in ways that are conceptually similar to the traditional associations of the cornucopia.
Damien Hirst’s "The Golden Calf" (2008): A gilded cow encased in formaldehyde, offering a critique of wealth and abundance, plays on themes historically symbolized by the cornucopia.
Banksy’s "Rage, the Flower Thrower" (2005): The juxtaposition of violence and the image of the cornucopia, often used to symbolize peace or wealth, comments on the commodification of protest and global inequality.
In modern times, the cornucopia remains a potent symbol, with California's horticultural abundance being likened to a horn of plenty (Rubatzky, 1985).
The Cornucopia in Modern Symbolism and Usage
What is the cornucopia slang for? A cornucopia is a lot of good stuff.
Commercialization and Consumerism
Once celebrated for its mythological roots as a representation of abundance, it is now frequently co-opted in advertising and consumer packaging to evoke feelings of surplus and generosity. As supermarkets deck their aisles with cornucopia motifs, they draw on its imagery to suggest not just an abundance of food, but also the joys of the holiday season and the act of giving. For instance, major brands like Coca-Cola have harnessed the visual power of the cornucopia in their holiday campaigns. This commercialization ultimately shifts the cornucopia’s meaning from a traditional symbol of gratitude and harvest to one that underscores consumerism and the pursuit of abundance, reflecting society's deeper relationship with consumption during this time of year.
Political and Economic Symbolism
The cornucopia serves as a powerful symbol in political propaganda and economic discourse, especially within the narrative of "American abundance." This iconic imagery resonates with the rhetoric surrounding national prosperity and has carved out a significant place in the iconography of capitalism, embodying both aspiration and excess. Within political imagery, the cornucopia symbolizes a flourishing economy; it represents the bountiful potential of American resources and the promises of growth during times of economic boom and government campaigns promoting abundance. Also featured in political cartoons, especially during times of economic growth or economic crisis, symbolizing both national prosperity and the dangers of overabundance. As such, the cornucopia not only reflects national wealth but also acts as a reminder, a celebration of communal success can sometimes veer into excess.
Comparison and Contrast of Cultural Uses
The materials and forms through which the cornucopia is expressed are diverse. While ancient Greek and Roman depictions are characterized by detailed, horn-shaped designs crafted from natural materials like terracotta or marble, modern interpretations may take on stylized forms using a variety of media—from illustrations in advertisements to decorations made of plastic or ceramic. One can still make of buy the table cornucopia made from reeds or other plant material, or even make on out of bread. This evolution in form captures the essence of the cornucopia's symbolism, yet showcases the flexibility of cultural expression as it resonates with changing societal values and aesthetics over time.
History Critique
The cornucopia is often seen in modern art to question ideas about excess and consumption. Artists use this symbol to reflect on historical events, especially in post-consumer societies where many people experience shortages despite the abundance of products. By contrasting the ideal image of plenty with the reality of economic inequality, artists encourage important discussions about wealth myths and the environmental effects of overconsumption.
The cornucopia often evokes nostalgia as artists connect it to memories of simpler, more abundant times. Artwork featuring cornucopias can stir feelings of longing for a less complicated past regarding economics and society. This nostalgia is both comforting and critical; it celebrates past ideals while questioning today's focus on consumption over meaningful relationships and sustainable practices.
Contemporary artists utilize the cornucopia motif to challenge contemporary views on wealth and its distribution. Through installation art, sculptures, and mixed media, the cornucopia is often presented in a decayed or disrupted state, symbolizing the fragility of wealth and the unsustainable nature of consumer culture. This approach encourages viewers to reconsider what abundance means in a world of inequality and climate change, effectively prompting a critical examination of societal values related to prosperity and success.
Even a sense of irony plays a significant role in the portrayal of the cornucopia in contemporary art. Artists might exaggerate the abundance depicted in a cornucopia to highlight the absurdities of consumer culture or to illustrate the disconnect between wealth and happiness. Such ironic representations serve not only to entertain but also to create a dialogue about the superficiality of consumption-driven lifestyles and the imperative of finding deeper satisfaction beyond material possessions.
Conclusion: Impacts on Cultural Traditions
The cornucopia began as a simple, natural horn and gradually became more ornate and decorative. In later periods, it evolved into a more symbolic and stylized form, especially in advertisements and modern art, where it might not even be a literal horn but simply a representation of superficial excess. Finally, its presence in commercial imagery underscores both a celebration of abundance and a critique of overconsumption, reflecting society's ambivalence toward wealth and material goods.
As we look at its enduring significance in contemporary visual culture, the cornucopia remains a versatile symbol found in fine art, graphic design, and advertising. Artists often invoke it to provoke discussions about societal values, encouraging a deeper reflection on what true abundance means in a world often characterized by inequality.
The cornucopia transcends its role as a mere artistic motif to become a powerful vehicle for cultural critique. This symbol, rooted in abundance and prosperity, adapts through various contexts, reflecting societal values and challenges. In classical antiquity, it celebrated agricultural bounty and divine favor, yet in contemporary interpretations, it can comment on issues such as consumerism and environmental sustainability. By overflowing with not only fruits and grains, but also discarded waste or luxury items, the cornucopia invites viewers to ponder the dichotomy of plenty versus wastefulness, celebration and critique, aspiration and excess, reminding us that abundance can be both a blessing and a burden in today’s world. Through its versatility, the cornucopia serves as a mirror, reflecting the complexities of the human experience and the ever-evolving narrative of cultural identity and remains to remind us that the quest for abundance is a timeless narrative, continuously rewritten within the contours of our evolving societies.
Further Reading & Citations Referenced
Alpers, S. L. (1967). Manner and meaning in some Rubens mythologies. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 30(1), 272-295.
Astour, M. C. (1966). Aegean place-names in an Egyptian inscription. American Journal of Archaeology, 70(4), 313-317.
Baines, J. (1985). Fecundity Figures: Egyptian personification and the iconology of a genre. (No Title).
Behjati-Ardakani, Z., Akhondi, M. M., Mahmoodzadeh, H., & Hosseini, S. H. (2016). An evaluation of the historical importance of fertility and its reflection in ancient mythology. Journal of reproduction & infertility, 17(1), 2.
Bennet, J. (1985). The structure of the Linear B administration at Knossos. American Journal of Archaeology, 89(2), 231-249.
Blackman, W. S. (1922). Some Occurrences of the Corn-‘Arūseh in Ancient Egyptian Tomb Paintings. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 8(1), 235-240.
Borumand, S. (2018). Cornucopia: Origins, diffusion and adoption in ancient Irano-Indian semiosphere. Studies in People’s History, 5(2), 166-179.
Bowman, M. (1993). Reinventing the Celts. Religion, 23(2), 147-156.
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (1998, July 20). Amalthaea. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Amalthaea
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2024, March 21). cornucopia. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/art/cornucopia.
Brown, A. C. (1916). From Cauldron of Plenty to Grail. Modern Philology, 14(7), 385-404.Leeming, David. (2005) The Oxford Companion to World Mythology (Oxford University Press, 2005). p. 13.
Brown, S., Stevens, L., & Maclaran, P. (2022). What’s the story, allegory?. Consumption Markets & Culture, 25(1), 34-51.
Burton, D. (2011). Hades: Cornucopiae, fertility and death. In 32nd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Classical Studies. Australasian Society for Classical Studies, Australasian Society for Classical Studies, Auckland.
Cahyono, M. D. (2012). Makna dan Fungsi Simbol Seks dalam Ritus Kesuburan Masa Majapahit. AMERTA, 30(1), 19-44.
Campbell, Virginia, L. (2017). Ancient Rome - Pocket Museum. Thames & Hudson. p. 196.
Clinton, K. (1992). Myth and cult. The iconography of the Eleusinian mysteries.
Coles, J. M. (1963, December). Irish Bronze Age horns and their relations with northern Europe. In Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society (Vol. 29, pp. 326-356). Cambridge University Press.
Cortés, M. A. (2019). The Significance of the Inanna/Ishtar Myths in Revelation 17. Revista Theologika, 34(2), 60-79.
Davidson, H. E. (2002). Milk and the Northern Goddess. In The concept of the goddess (pp. 105-120). Routledge.
Fears, J. Rufus. (1981). "The Cult of Virtues and Roman Imperial Ideology," Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.17.2, p. 821.
Frankfort, H. (1996). The Art and Architecture of the Ancient Orient. Yale University Press.
Ghorbani, L. (2023). The Goddess Fortuna on Augustus Coins: A Semiotic Study of Visual Representation and Cultural Significance.
Gimbutas, M. (1987). The Earth Fertility of Old Europe. Dialogues d'histoire ancienne, 13(1), 11-69.
Glaser, G. (2022). Котелот-моќен женски симбол на регенерацијата, просветлувањето и човечката судбина. Македонски фолклор, 82(LIII), 191-208./Glaser, Gerlinde. 2022. The Cauldron – a powerful feminine symbol of regeneration, enlightenment and human destiny (Report Paper).
Goesch, A. (1996). Diana Ephesia: ikonographische Studien zur Allegorie der Natur in der Kunst vom 16.-19. Jahrhundert.
Graham, S. (2006). Networks, agent-based models and the Antonine itineraries: implications for Roman archaeology. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 19(1), 45.
Graham, A., & Kamm, A. (2020). The Romans: an introduction. Routledge.
Gravel, P. B. (1995). The malevolent eye: an essay on the evil eye, fertility and the concept of mana. (No Title).
Graves, Robert. (2017). The Greek Myths: The Complete and Definitive Edition. Penguin Books Limited.
Green, M. (2003). Symbol and image in Celtic religious art. Routledge.
Hachmann, R. (1990). Gundestrup-Studien. Untersuchungen zu den spätkeltischen Grundlagen der frühgermanischen Kunst. Bericht der römisch-germanischen Kommission, 71(2), 565-903.
Hardwick, L. (2017). Myth, Creativity and Repressions in Modern Literature: Refigurations from Ancient Greek Myth. Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics, 40(2), 11-26.
Harrison, T. (2015). Beyond the polis? New approaches to Greek religion. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 135, 165-180.
Hauser-Schaublin, B. (1994). The track of the triangle: Form and meaning in the Sepik, Papua New Guinea. Pacific Studies, 17, 38-38.
Hofmann, A. (2015). Drinking Horns in Old Norse Culture A Tradition Under Examination. Analecta Archaeologica Ressoviensia, (10), 241-270.
Homer (1987) [1st pub. c. 735 B.C.]. The Iliad. Vol. 2. Translated by Martin Hammond. Penguin Classics. pp. 446–9.
Jacobsen, T., & Kramer, S. N. (1953). The myth of Inanna and Bilulu. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 12(3), 160-188.
Jaffe, H. (2017). A history of Africa. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Janick, J. (2000, October). Ancient Egyptian agriculture and the origins of horticulture. In International Symposium on Mediterranean Horticulture: Issues and Prospects 582 (pp. 23-39).
Johnston, P. A. & Mastrocinque, A. (2016). Animals in Greek and Roman Religion and Myth. United Kingdom: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kamel, S. (2019). Les offrandes de viande dans l'Égypte ancienne d'après les représentations des temples Gréco-romaines. مجـلة کلية الآثـار بقنا-جامعة [Meat offerings in ancient Egypt based on depictions in Greco-Roman temples.] جنوب الوادي, 11(1), 1-24.
Kantor, H. J. (1957). Narration in Egyptian art. American Journal of Archaeology, 61(1), 44-54.
Kerenyi, Karl. (1951).The Gods of the Greeks. London: Thames & Hudson.
Klindt-Jensen, O. (1959). The Gundestrup bowl: a reassessment. antiquity, 33(131), 161-169.
Kozák, J. A. (2021). Óðinn and the Mead: The Two-Faced Myth. Viking and Medieval Scandinavia, 17, 135-164.
Lambert, W. G. (2013). Babylonian creation myths. Penn State Press.
Langin-Hooper, S. M. (2023). Burying the Alabaster Goddess in Hellenistic Babylonia: Religious Power, Sexual Agency, and Accessing the Afterlife Through Ishtar-Aphrodite Figurines from Seleucid-Parthian Iraq. American Journal of Archaeology, 127(2), 209-240.
Lindow, J. (2002). Norse mythology: A guide to gods, heroes, rituals, and beliefs. Oxford University Press.
Maiorino, G. (1990). The Cornucopian mind and the baroque unity of the arts. Penn State Press.
Mandabach, M. (2021). Matter as an Artist: Rubens’s Myths of Spontaneous Generation. Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art, 13(2).
Manning, J. G., & Morris, I. (2005). The ancient economy: Evidence and models. Stanford University Press.
Mardan, G. (2012). Geometric Motifs in ancient Sumerian Art. Athar Alrafedain, 1(1), 189-199.
Matthews, L. (2011). Roman constructions of fortuna (Doctoral dissertation, Oxford University, UK).
McGrath, E. (1977). Rubens's infant-cornucopia. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 40(1), 315-318.
Miller, N. F. (2013). Symbols of fertility and abundance in the Royal Cemetery at Ur, Iraq. American Journal of Archaeology, 117(1), 127-133.
Mundkur, B. (1978). Notes on two ancient fertility symbols. East and West, 28(1/4), 263-282.
Nagy, Joseph Falaky. “How Time Flies in the Cath Maige Tuired.” In Myth and History in Celtic and Scandinavian Traditions, edited by Emily Lyle, 95–116. Amsterdam University Press, 2021.
Nance, D. A. (2019). Plate f of the Gundestrup “cauldron”: symbols of spring and fertility. Anthropozoologica, 54(1), 141-150.
National Museum of Denmark. (n.d.). “The Grave from Mammen”. Accessed from: https://en.natmus.dk/historical-knowledge/denmark/prehistoric-period-until-1050-ad/the-viking-age/the-grave-from-mammen/.
Neda, H. (2023). The symbolism of the triangle for the concept of fertility in the arts of ancient civilizations. Journal of the Faculty of Archaeology, Qena - South Valley University, 18(1), 896-919.
Olmsted, G. S. (1976). The Gundestrup version of Táin Bó Cuailnge. Antiquity, 50(198), 95-103.
Ornan, T. (2005). The triumph of the symbol: pictorial representation of deities in Mesopotamia and the biblical image ban (Vol. 213). Saint-Paul.
Ovid, first in its tragic denouement (Metamorphoses 2:531–65): a crow reports Aglaurus’s disobedience to Minerva, who punishes her by driving her mad until she falls off a cliff to her death. Later (Metamorphoses 2:708–832), an earlier segment is narrated: Mercury falls in love with Herse, but when Aglaurus, jealous of her sister, refuses to let him past the threshold, the god turns her to stone.
Parker, R. (2005). Polytheism and society at Athens. United Kingdom: OUP Oxford. p.422.
Peet, T. E. (1920). A Stela of the Reign of Sheshonk IV. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 6(1), 56-57.
Perkins, A. (1957). Narration in Babylonian art. American Journal of Archaeology, 61(1), 54-62.
Pintado, JA, Zuazúa, N., Martija, JA, & Plumed, HR (2011). On a Roman marble cornucopia from the territory of the Roman city of Campo Real/Fillera (Sangüesa, Navarre). Príncipe de Viana , 72 (253), 97-120.
Prusac, M. (2011). Personifications of Eudaimonia, Felicitas and Fortuna in Greek and Roman Art. Symbolae Osloenses, 85(1), 74-93.
Pryce, T. D. (1930). Cornucopia bowls and allied vessels. The Antiquaries Journal, 10(4), 344-355.
ReFaey, K., Quinones, G. C., Clifton, W., Tripathi, S., & Quiñones-Hinojosa, A. (2019). The eye of horus: The connection between art, medicine, and mythology in ancient Egypt. Cureus, 11(5).
Reiche, H. A. (1973). The Golden Horns of Jutland.
Reid, K. (2023). Martianus Capella in the Late Middle Ages and Renaissance (Vol. 28). Brill.
Rubatzky, V. E. (1985). California: a horticultural cornucopia. HortScience, 20(6), 984-1147.
Schroder, M. (2019). "Imperial Coinage Academic Description". academic.sun.ac.za. Retrieved 2020-05-22.
Shaw, J. (2019). The Dagda, Thor and ATU 1148B: Analogues, Parallels, or Correspondences?. Temenos-Nordic Journal for the Study of Religion, 55(1), 97-120.
Smith, W. (Ed.). (1853). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology: Abaeus-Dysponteus (Vol. 1). Walton and Maberly.
Stern, G. (2015). The new cult of Pax Augusta 13 BC–AD 14. Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 55(1-4), 1-16.
Strandberg, Å. (2009). The gazelle in ancient Egyptian art: image and meaning (Doctoral dissertation).
Taher, Isra Hashim. (2019). القمر في الثقافة العراقية القديمة: اعادة قراءة لرواية" الهلال" لديانا ابو جابر و" طشاري" لأنعام كججي. [The Moon in Ancient Iraqi Culture: A Re-Reading of Diana Abu Jaber's "Hilal" and An'am Kajaji's "Tashari"]. ALUSTATH JOURNAL FOR HUMAN AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 58(2), 115-128.
Taiz, Lincoln, and Lee Taiz. (2018, 19 July). 'Sacred Trees and Enclosed Gardens', Flora Unveiled: The Discovery and Denial of Sex in Plants (New York, 2017) Oxford Academic.
Tanabe, Katsumi. (2003). 東京国立博物館, 兵庫県立美術館, 日本放送協会, & NHK プロモ-シヨン. Alexander the Great: East-West cultural contacts from Greece to Japan. 東京国立博物館. [Tokyo National Museum, Hyogo Prefectural Museum of Art, Japan Broadcasting Corporation, & NHK Promotion].
Wilkinson, R. H. (1992). Reading Egyptian Art: hieroglyphic guide to ancient Egyptian painting and sculpture. Thames and Hudson.
Winter, I. J. (2009). Chapter Four. Ornament And The" Rhetoric Of Abundance" In Assyria. In On Art in the Ancient Near East Volume I (pp. 163-183). Brill.
Winter, I. J. (2009). Chapter Twenty-Four. Representing Abundance: A Visual Dimension Of The Agrarian State. In On Art in the Ancient Near East Volume II (pp. 197-225). Brill.
